Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. There is a good number of Americans whose interest is to see the part played by money in politics being put under control. It is for this reason that a good number of people have been patiently waiting for this ruling to see if corporates will be given the room to donate in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. It is evident that nonprofit as well as charity organizations are not allowed to finance any of these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.
Quotes: browse this site